Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: HELP
Articles by Jozef Rovensky
Based on 8 articles published since 2010
(Why 8 articles?)
||||

Between 2010 and 2020, J. Rovensky wrote the following 8 articles about Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Guideline Treat-to-target in systemic lupus erythematosus: recommendations from an international task force. 2014

van Vollenhoven, Ronald F / Mosca, Marta / Bertsias, George / Isenberg, David / Kuhn, Annegret / Lerstrøm, Kirsten / Aringer, Martin / Bootsma, Hendrika / Boumpas, Dimitrios / Bruce, Ian N / Cervera, Ricard / Clarke, Ann / Costedoat-Chalumeau, Nathalie / Czirják, László / Derksen, Ronald / Dörner, Thomas / Gordon, Caroline / Graninger, Winfried / Houssiau, Frédéric / Inanc, Murat / Jacobsen, Søren / Jayne, David / Jedryka-Goral, Anna / Levitsky, Adrian / Levy, Roger / Mariette, Xavier / Morand, Eric / Navarra, Sandra / Neumann, Irmgard / Rahman, Anisur / Rovensky, Jozef / Smolen, Josef / Vasconcelos, Carlos / Voskuyl, Alexandre / Voss, Anne / Zakharova, Helena / Zoma, Asad / Schneider, Matthias. ·Department of Medicine, Unit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases, Stockholm, Sweden, Karolinska Institutet, , Stockholm, Sweden. ·Ann Rheum Dis · Pubmed #24739325.

ABSTRACT: The principle of treating-to-target has been successfully applied to many diseases outside rheumatology and more recently to rheumatoid arthritis. Identifying appropriate therapeutic targets and pursuing these systematically has led to improved care for patients with these diseases and useful guidance for healthcare providers and administrators. Thus, an initiative to evaluate possible therapeutic targets and develop treat-to-target guidance was believed to be highly appropriate in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients as well. Specialists in rheumatology, nephrology, dermatology, internal medicine and clinical immunology, and a patient representative, contributed to this initiative. The majority convened on three occasions in 2012-2013. Twelve topics of critical importance were identified and a systematic literature review was performed. The results were condensed and reformulated as recommendations, discussed, modified and voted upon. The finalised bullet points were analysed for degree of agreement among the task force. The Oxford Centre level of evidence (LoE, corresponding to the research questions) and grade of recommendation (GoR) were determined for each recommendation. The 12 systematic literature searches and their summaries led to 11 recommendations. Prominent features of these recommendations are targeting remission, preventing damage and improving quality of life. LoE and GoR of the recommendations were variable but agreement was >0.9 in each case. An extensive research agenda was identified, and four overarching principles were also agreed upon. Treat-to-target-in-SLE (T2T/SLE) recommendations were developed by a large task force of multispecialty experts and a patient representative. It is anticipated that 'treating-to-target' can and will be applicable to the care of patients with SLE.

2 Review A framework for remission in SLE: consensus findings from a large international task force on definitions of remission in SLE (DORIS). 2017

van Vollenhoven, Ronald / Voskuyl, Alexandre / Bertsias, George / Aranow, Cynthia / Aringer, Martin / Arnaud, Laurent / Askanase, Anca / Balážová, Petra / Bonfa, Eloisa / Bootsma, Hendrika / Boumpas, Dimitrios / Bruce, Ian / Cervera, Ricard / Clarke, Ann / Coney, Cindy / Costedoat-Chalumeau, Nathalie / Czirják, László / Derksen, Ronald / Doria, Andrea / Dörner, Thomas / Fischer-Betz, Rebecca / Fritsch-Stork, Ruth / Gordon, Caroline / Graninger, Winfried / Györi, Noémi / Houssiau, Frédéric / Isenberg, David / Jacobsen, Soren / Jayne, David / Kuhn, Annegret / Le Guern, Veronique / Lerstrøm, Kirsten / Levy, Roger / Machado-Ribeiro, Francinne / Mariette, Xavier / Missaykeh, Jamil / Morand, Eric / Mosca, Marta / Inanc, Murat / Navarra, Sandra / Neumann, Irmgard / Olesinska, Marzena / Petri, Michelle / Rahman, Anisur / Rekvig, Ole Petter / Rovensky, Jozef / Shoenfeld, Yehuda / Smolen, Josef / Tincani, Angela / Urowitz, Murray / van Leeuw, Bernadette / Vasconcelos, Carlos / Voss, Anne / Werth, Victoria P / Zakharova, Helena / Zoma, Asad / Schneider, Matthias / Ward, Michael. ·Department of Medicine, Unit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases (ClinTRID), Karolinska Institutet, D1:00 Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden. · Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University of Crete School of Medicine, Iraklion, Greece. · Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA. · Department of Medicine III, University Medical Center TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. · New York University, New York, USA. · LPRe SR-Klub Motýlik, Bratislava, Slovakia. · Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. · Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. · Department of Medicine and Joint Academic Rheumatology Program Medical School, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. · NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Unit, The University of Manchester and Central Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. · Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. · Division of Rheumatology, The Arthritis Society Chair in Rheumatic Diseases Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. · Lupus Foundation of America, Washington DC, USA. · Université Paris-Decartes, Paris, France. · AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, service de médecine interne, centre de reference maladies auto-immunes et systémiques rares, Paris, France. · Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Institute of Bioanalysis, Institute of Family Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary. · Third Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. · Department Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. · Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. · Department Medicine/Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. · Polyclinic of Rheumatology, Hiller Research Unit, University Clinic Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany. · Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. · Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. · Service de Rhumatologie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Pôle de pathologies rhumatismales inflammatoires et systémiques, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium. · Department of Medicine, The Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, UK. · Copenhagen Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen, Denmark. · Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. · Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials (IZKS), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany. · LUPUS EUROPE, co-opted trustee for research, Essex UK. · Rheumatology Department, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. · Université Paris-Sud; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-sud; INSERM U1184, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France. · Bone Densitometry Unit, Monla Hospital, Tripoli, Lebanon. · Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Australia. · Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. · Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey. · University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines. · Vasculitis.at, Vienna, Austria. · Department of Connective Tissues Diseases, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland. · Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. · RNA and Molecular Pathology Research Group, Institute of Medical Biology, Health Science Faculty, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway. · National Institute for Rheumatic Diseases, Piešťany, Slovak Republic. · Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center (Affiliated to Tel-Aviv University), Tel-Aviv, Israel. · Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. · 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria. · Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Sperimentali, Università degli Studi di Brescia, U.O. Reumatologia e Immunolgia Clinica, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy. · Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, Senior Scientist Krembil Research Institute, Professor Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital EW 1-409, Toronto, Canada. · Unidade de Imunologia Clínica, Hospital Santo António, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, UMIB, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. · Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark. · Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center (Philadelphia), Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA. · Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. · Nephrology Unit, City Clinical Hospital n.a. S.P. Botkin, Moscow, Russia. · Lanarkshire Centre for Rheumatology, Hairmyres Hospital, Scotland, UK. · National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. ·Ann Rheum Dis · Pubmed #27884822.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: Treat-to-target recommendations have identified 'remission' as a target in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but recognise that there is no universally accepted definition for this. Therefore, we initiated a process to achieve consensus on potential definitions for remission in SLE. METHODS: An international task force of 60 specialists and patient representatives participated in preparatory exercises, a face-to-face meeting and follow-up electronic voting. The level for agreement was set at 90%. RESULTS: The task force agreed on eight key statements regarding remission in SLE and three principles to guide the further development of remission definitions:1. Definitions of remission will be worded as follows: CONCLUSIONS: The work of this international task force provides a framework for testing different definitions of remission against long-term outcomes.

3 Review Rheumatic diseases and Klinefelter's syndrome. 2010

Rovenský, J / Imrich, R / Lazúrová, I / Payer, J. ·National Institute of Rheumatic Diseases, Piest'any, Slovakia. rovensky.jozef@nurch.sk ·Ann N Y Acad Sci · Pubmed #20398000.

ABSTRACT: The article summarizes reports on the concurrence of Klinefelter's syndrome (KS) with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, mixed connective tissue disease, the antiphospholipid syndrome, and ankylosing spondylitis. These include two case reports of patients with KS concurrently associated with RA or antisynthetase syndrome, respectively, previously reported by the author and his coworkers. Attention is paid to the pathogenesis and the course of the disease in patients with KS. The importance of early diagnosis of the syndrome, when occurring simultaneously with other diseases of connective tissue, is emphasized.

4 Article Extended follow-up of the CYCLOFA-LUNE trial comparing two sequential induction and maintenance treatment regimens for proliferative lupus nephritis based either on cyclophosphamide or on cyclosporine A. 2014

Závada, J / Sinikka Pesicková, S / Rysavá, R / Horák, P / Hrncír, Z / Lukác, J / Rovensky, J / Vítová, J / Havrda, M / Rychlík, I / Böhmova, J / Vlasáková, V / Slatinská, J / Zadrazil, J / Olejárová, M / Tegzova, D / Tesar, V. ·1Institute of Rheumatology and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. ·Lupus · Pubmed #24213308.

ABSTRACT: Objective To evaluate the extended follow-up of the CYCLOFA-LUNE trial, a randomized prospective trial comparing two sequential induction and maintenance treatment regimens for proliferative lupus nephritis based either on cyclophosphamide (CPH) or cyclosporine A (CyA). Patients and methods Data for kidney function and adverse events were collected by a cross-sectional survey for 38 of 40 patients initially randomized in the CYCLOFA-LUNE trial. Results The median follow-up time was 7.7 years (range 5.0-10.3). Rates of renal impairment and end-stage renal disease, adverse events (death, cardiovascular event, tumor, premature menopause) did not differ between the CPH and CyA group, nor did mean serum creatinine, 24 h proteinuria and SLICC damage score at last follow-up. Most patients in both groups were still treated with glucocorticoids, other immunosuppressant agents and blood pressure lowering drugs. Conclusion An immunosuppressive regimen based on CyA achieved similar clinical results to that based on CPH in the very long term.

5 Article Hyperferritinemia is associated with serologic antiphospholipid syndrome in SLE patients. 2013

Zandman-Goddard, Gisele / Orbach, Hedi / Agmon-Levin, Nancy / Boaz, Mona / Amital, Howard / Szekanecz, Zoltan / Szucs, Gabriella / Rovensky, Josef / Kiss, Emese / Corocher, Nadia / Doria, Andrea / Stojanovich, Ljudmila / Ingegnoli, Francesca / Meroni, Pier Luigi / Rozman, Blaz / Gomez-Arbesu, Jesus / Blank, Miri / Shoenfeld, Yehuda. ·Departments of Medicine C, Wolfson Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel, goddard@wolfson.health.gov.il. ·Clin Rev Allergy Immunol · Pubmed #21394428.

ABSTRACT: Ferritin may play a direct role on the immune system. We sought to determine if elevated levels of ferritin in lupus patients correlate with disease activity and organ involvement in a large cohort. Ferritin levels (gender and age adjusted) were assessed in 274 lupus serum samples utilizing the LIASON Ferritin automated immunoassay method. Significant disease activity was determined if European Consensus Lupus Activity Index (ECLAM)>2 or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)>4. Utilizing an EXCEL database, we compared elevated ferritin levels to manifestations grouped by organ involvement, serology, and previous therapy. The patients were predominantly female (89%), median age was 37 years old, and disease duration was 10.6 ± 7.7 years. Hyperferritinemia was found in 18.6% of SLE patients. Compared to subjects with normal ferritin levels, a significantly greater proportion of patients with hyperferritinemia had thrombocytopenia (15.4% vs. 33.3%, p=0.003) and lupus anticoagulant (11.3% vs. 29.0%, p=0.01). Additionally, compared to normoferritinemic subjects, hyperferritinemic subjects had significantly higher total aCL (99.7 ± 369 vs. 30.9 ± 17.3 GPI, p=0.02) and aCL IgM antibody levels (75.3 ± 357.4 vs. 9.3 ± 10.3 GPI, p=0.02), and marginally lower aCL IgG antibody levels (9.2 ± 4.9 vs. 9.7 ± 3.9 GPI, p = 0.096). While the ECLAM score significantly correlated with hyperferritinemia (p=0.04), the SLEDAI score was marginally associated with hyperferritinemia (p = 0.1). Serositis was marginally associated with hyperferritinemia, but not with other manifestations. An association with serologic APS was encountered. Hyperferritinemia was associated with thrombocytopenia, lupus anticoagulant, and anti-cardiolipin antibodies suggest that it may be an early marker for secondary antiphospholipid syndrome in SLE patients.

6 Article Prolactin and autoimmunity: hyperprolactinemia correlates with serositis and anemia in SLE patients. 2012

Orbach, Hedi / Zandman-Goddard, Gisele / Boaz, Mona / Agmon-Levin, Nancy / Amital, Howard / Szekanecz, Zoltan / Szucs, Gabriella / Rovensky, Josef / Kiss, Emese / Doria, Andrea / Ghirardello, Anna / Gomez-Arbesu, Jesus / Stojanovich, Ljudmila / Ingegnoli, Francesca / Meroni, Pier Luigi / Rozman, Blaz' / Blank, Miri / Shoenfeld, Yehuda. ·Department of Medicine B, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel. orbach@wolfson.health.gov.il ·Clin Rev Allergy Immunol · Pubmed #21287295.

ABSTRACT: Evidence points to an association of prolactin to autoimmune diseases. We examined the correlation between hyperprolactinemia and disease manifestations and activity in a large patient cohort. Age- and sex-adjusted prolactin concentration was assessed in 256 serum samples from lupus patients utilizing the LIASON prolactin automated immunoassay method (DiaSorin S.p.A, Saluggia, Italy). Disease activity was defined as present if European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM) > 2 or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) > 4. Lupus manifestations were grouped by organ involvement, laboratory data, and prescribed medications. Hyperprolactinemia was presented in 46/256 (18%) of the cohort. Hyperprolactinemic patients had significantly more serositis (40% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.03) specifically, pleuritis (33% vs. 17%, p = 0.02), pericarditis (30% vs. 12%, p = 0.002), and peritonitis (15% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.003). Hyperprolactinemic subjects exhibited significantly more anemia (42% vs. 26%, p = 0.02) and marginally more proteinuria (65.5% vs. 46%, p = 0.06). Elevated levels of prolactin were not significantly associated with other clinical manifestations, serology, or therapy. Disease activity scores were not associated with hyperprolactinemia. Hyperprolactinemia in lupus patients is associated with all types of serositis and anemia but not with other clinical, serological therapeutic measures or with disease activity. These results suggest that dopamine agonists may be an optional therapy for lupus patients with hyperprolactinemia.

7 Article Cyclosporine A or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis: the Cyclofa-Lune study. 2010

Zavada, J / Pesickova, Ss / Rysava, R / Olejarova, M / Horák, P / Hrncír, Z / Rychlík, I / Havrda, M / Vítova, J / Lukác, J / Rovensky, J / Tegzova, D / Böhmova, J / Zadrazil, J / Hána, J / Dostál, C / Tesar, V. ·Institute of Rheumatology and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. zavada@revma.cz ·Lupus · Pubmed #20605876.

ABSTRACT: Intravenous cyclophosphamide is considered to be the standard of care for the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis. However, its use is limited by potentially severe toxic effects. Cyclosporine A has been suggested to be an efficient and safe treatment alternative to cyclophosphamide. Forty patients with clinically active proliferative lupus nephritis were randomly assigned to one of two sequential induction and maintenance treatment regimens based either on cyclophosphamide or Cyclosporine A. The primary outcomes were remission (defined as normal urinary sediment, proteinuria <0.3 g/24 h, and stable s-creatinine) and response to therapy (defined as stable s-creatinine, 50% reduction in proteinuria, and either normalization of urinary sediment or significant improvement in C3) at the end of induction and maintenance phase. Secondary outcomes were incidence of adverse events, and relapse-free survival. At the end of the induction phase, 24% of the 21 patients treated by cyclophosphamide achieved remission, and 52% achieved response, as compared with 26% and 43%, respectively of the 19 patients treated by the Cyclosporine A. At the end of the maintenance phase, 14% of patients in cyclophosphamide group, and 37% in Cyclosporine A group had remission, and 38% and 58% respectively response. Treatment with Cyclosporine A was associated with transient increase in blood pressure and reversible decrease in glomerular filtration rate. There was no significant difference in median relapse-free survival. In conclusion, Cyclosporine A was as effective as cyclophosphamide in the trial of sequential induction and maintenance treatment in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis and preserved renal function.(ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00976300)

8 Article Serum concentrations of 25-OH vitamin D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are inversely related to disease activity: is it time to routinely supplement patients with SLE with vitamin D? 2010

Amital, H / Szekanecz, Z / Szücs, G / Dankó, K / Nagy, E / Csépány, T / Kiss, E / Rovensky, J / Tuchynova, A / Kozakova, D / Doria, A / Corocher, N / Agmon-Levin, N / Barak, V / Orbach, H / Zandman-Goddard, G / Shoenfeld, Y. ·Department of Medicine 'B' and Centre for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Centre, (Affiliated to Tel-Aviv University) Tel-Hashomer 52621, Israel. ·Ann Rheum Dis · Pubmed #20439290.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Low serum vitamin D concentrations have been reported in several autoimmune disorders. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether low serum vitamin D concentrations are related to disease activity of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: 378 patients from several European and Israeli cohorts were pooled and their disease activity was measured by two different methods: 278 patients had SLE disease activity-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores and 100 patients had European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM) scores. In order to combine the two systems the scores were converted into standardised values (z-scores), enabling univariate summary statistics for the two variables (SLEDAI-2K and ECLAM). The commercial kit, LIAISON 25-OH vitamin D assay (310900-Diasorin) was used to measure serum concentration of 25-OH vitamin D in 378 patients with SLE. RESULTS: A significant negative correlation was demonstrated between the serum concentration of vitamin D and the standardised values (z-scores) of disease activity scores as measured by the SLEDAI-2K and ECLAM scales (Pearson's correlation coefficient r=-0.12, p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with SLE originating from Israel and Europe vitamin D serum concentrations were found to be inversely related to disease activity.