Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Melanoma HELP
Based on 32,740 articles published since 2009
|||| 16 

These are the 32740 published articles about Melanoma that originated from Worldwide during 2009-2019.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
Pages: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20
1 Guideline Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. 2019

Swetter, Susan M / Tsao, Hensin / Bichakjian, Christopher K / Curiel-Lewandrowski, Clara / Elder, David E / Gershenwald, Jeffrey E / Guild, Valerie / Grant-Kels, Jane M / Halpern, Allan C / Johnson, Timothy M / Sober, Arthur J / Thompson, John A / Wisco, Oliver J / Wyatt, Samantha / Hu, Shasa / Lamina, Toyin. ·Department of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California. Electronic address: sswetter@stanford.edu. · Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Boston, Massachusetts. · Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan. · Division of Dermatology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona. · Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. · Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. · AIM at Melanoma Foundation, Plano, Texas. · Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut; Department of Pathology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut; Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut. · Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. · Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. · Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington. · Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. · Decatur Dermatology, Decatur, Alabama. · Department of Dermatology, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida. · American Academy of Dermatology, Rosemont, Illinois. ·J Am Acad Dermatol · Pubmed #30392755.

ABSTRACT: The incidence of primary cutaneous melanoma continues to increase each year. Melanoma accounts for the majority of skin cancer-related deaths, but treatment is usually curative following early detection of disease. In this American Academy of Dermatology clinical practice guideline, updated treatment recommendations are provided for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 0-IIC and pathologic stage III by virtue of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy). Biopsy techniques for a lesion that is clinically suggestive of melanoma are reviewed, as are recommendations for the histopathologic interpretation of cutaneous melanoma. The use of laboratory, molecular, and imaging tests is examined in the initial work-up of patients with newly diagnosed melanoma and for follow-up of asymptomatic patients. With regard to treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma, recommendations for surgical margins and the concepts of staged excision (including Mohs micrographic surgery) and nonsurgical treatments for melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type (including topical imiquimod and radiation therapy), are updated. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging technique for cutaneous melanoma is described, with recommendations for its use in clinical practice. Finally, current data regarding pregnancy and melanoma, genetic testing for familial melanoma, and management of dermatologic toxicities related to novel targeted agents and immunotherapies for patients with advanced disease are summarized.

2 Guideline [Treatment of patients with inoperable stage III or stage IV melanoma. Société française de dermatologie]. 2018

Guillot, B / Charles, J / Jeudy, G / Cupissol, D / Dupuy, A / Dutriaux, C / Gangloff, D / Magne, N / Mirabel, X / M'Sadek, A / Pracht, M / Sichel, C / Do Outeiro, G. ·Département de dermatologie, hôpital Saint-Éloi, CHU de Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France. Electronic address: b-guillot@chu-montpellier.fr. · CHU de Grenoble, 38700 Grenoble, France. · CHU de Dijon, 21000 Dijon, France. · Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France. · CHU de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France. · CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France. · Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse, 31100 Toulouse, France. · Institut de cancérologie de la Loire, 42270 Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France. · Centre Oscar-Lambret, 59000 Lille, France. · Centre Eugène-Marquis, 35000 Rennes, France. · 13470 Carnoux en Provence, France. · Institut national du cancer de Boulogne-Billancourt, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France. ·Ann Dermatol Venereol · Pubmed #29703640.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

3 Guideline Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. 2018

Wong, Sandra L / Faries, Mark B / Kennedy, Erin B / Agarwala, Sanjiv S / Akhurst, Timothy J / Ariyan, Charlotte / Balch, Charles M / Berman, Barry S / Cochran, Alistair / Delman, Keith A / Gorman, Mark / Kirkwood, John M / Moncrieff, Marc D / Zager, Jonathan S / Lyman, Gary H. ·Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. · The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA. · American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA. guidelines@asco.org. · St Luke's Cancer Center, Easton, PA, USA. · Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. · MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. · Broward Health, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA. · Los Angeles Center for Health Services, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. · Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. · , Silver Spring, MD, USA. · University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. · Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK. · H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. ·Ann Surg Oncol · Pubmed #29236202.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) guideline for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in melanoma. METHODS: An ASCO-SSO panel was formed, and a systematic review of the literature was conducted regarding SLN biopsy and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive sentinel node in patients with melanoma. RESULTS: Nine new observational studies, two systematic reviews and an updated randomized controlled trial (RCT) of SLN biopsy, as well as two randomized controlled trials of CLND after positive SLN biopsy, were included. RECOMMENDATIONS: Routine SLN biopsy is not recommended for patients with thin melanomas that are T1a (non-ulcerated lesions < 0.8 mm in Breslow thickness). SLN biopsy may be considered for thin melanomas that are T1b (0.8 to 1.0 mm Breslow thickness or <0.8 mm Breslow thickness with ulceration) after a thorough discussion with the patient of the potential benefits and risk of harms associated with the procedure. SLN biopsy is recommended for patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas (T2 or T3; Breslow thickness of >1.0 to 4.0 mm). SLN biopsy may be recommended for patients with thick melanomas (T4; > 4.0 mm in Breslow thickness), after a discussion of the potential benefits and risks of harm. In the case of a positive SLN biopsy, CLND or careful observation are options for patients with low-risk micrometastatic disease, with due consideration of clinicopathological factors. For higher risk patients, careful observation may be considered only after a thorough discussion with patients about the potential risks and benefits of foregoing CLND. Important qualifying statements outlining relevant clinicopathological factors, and details of the reference patient populations are included within the guideline.

4 Guideline Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. 2018

Wong, Sandra L / Faries, Mark B / Kennedy, Erin B / Agarwala, Sanjiv S / Akhurst, Timothy J / Ariyan, Charlotte / Balch, Charles M / Berman, Barry S / Cochran, Alistair / Delman, Keith A / Gorman, Mark / Kirkwood, John M / Moncrieff, Marc D / Zager, Jonathan S / Lyman, Gary H. ·Sandra L. Wong, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH · Mark B. Faries, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica · Alistair Cochran, University of California, Los Angeles Center for Health Services, Los Angeles, CA · Erin B. Kennedy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA · Sanjiv S. Agarwala, St Luke's Cancer Center, Easton · John M. Kirkwood, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA · Timothy J. Akhurst, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia · Charlotte Ariyan, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY · Charles M. Balch, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX · Barry S. Berman, Broward Health, Fort Lauderdale · Jonathan S. Zager, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL · Keith A. Delman, Emory University, Atlanta, GA · Mark Gorman, Silver Spring, MD · Marc D. Moncrieff, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom · and Gary H. Lyman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. ·J Clin Oncol · Pubmed #29232171.

ABSTRACT: Purpose To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) guideline for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in melanoma. Methods An ASCO-SSO panel was formed, and a systematic review of the literature was conducted regarding SLN biopsy and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive sentinel node in patients with melanoma. Results Nine new observational studies, two systematic reviews, and an updated randomized controlled trial of SLN biopsy, as well as two randomized controlled trials of CLND after positive SLN biopsy, were included. Recommendations Routine SLN biopsy is not recommended for patients with thin melanomas that are T1a (nonulcerated lesions < 0.8 mm in Breslow thickness). SLN biopsy may be considered for thin melanomas that are T1b (0.8 to 1.0 mm Breslow thickness or < 0.8 mm Breslow thickness with ulceration) after a thorough discussion with the patient of the potential benefits and risk of harms associated with the procedure. SLN biopsy is recommended for patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas (T2 or T3; Breslow thickness of > 1.0 to 4.0 mm). SLN biopsy may be recommended for patients with thick melanomas (T4; > 4.0 mm in Breslow thickness), after a discussion of the potential benefits and risks of harm. In the case of a positive SLN biopsy, CLND or careful observation are options for patients with low-risk micrometastatic disease, with due consideration of clinicopathological factors. For higher-risk patients, careful observation may be considered only after a thorough discussion with patients about the potential risks and benefits of foregoing CLND. Important qualifying statements outlining relevant clinicopathological factors and details of the reference patient populations are included within the guideline. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/melanoma-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

5 Guideline Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary. 2018

Wong, Sandra L / Kennedy, Erin B / Lyman, Gary H. ·Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; American Society for Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. ·J Oncol Pract · Pubmed #29232158.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

6 Guideline SEOM clinical guideline for the management of malignant melanoma (2017). 2018

Berrocal, A / Arance, A / Castellon, V E / de la Cruz, L / Espinosa, E / Cao, M G / Larriba, J L G / Márquez-Rodas, I / Soria, A / Algarra, S M. ·Servicio de Oncología Médica, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Avda. Tres Cruces 2, 46014, Valencia, Spain. berrocal.alf@gmail.com. · Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. · Hospital Torrecárdenas, Almería, Spain. · Complejo Hospitalario Regional Virgen Macaren, Seville, Spain. · Hospital Universitario la Paz, Madrid, Spain. · Hospital Universitario Quirón Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain. · Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. · Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. · Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. · Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. ·Clin Transl Oncol · Pubmed #29116432.

ABSTRACT: All melanoma suspected patients must be confirmed histologically and resected. Sentinel node biopsy must be done when tumor is over 1 mm or if less with high-risk factors. Adjuvant therapy with interferon could be offered for patients with high-risk melanoma and in selected cases radiotherapy can be added. Metastatic melanoma treatment is guided by mutational BRAF status. BRAF wild type patients must receive anti-PD1 containing therapy and BRAF mutated patients BRAF/MEK inhibitors or anti-PD1 containing therapy. Up to 10 years follow up is reasonable for melanoma patients with dermatologic examinations and physical exams.

7 Guideline Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of melanoma: melanomas that lack classical clinical features. 2017

Mar, Victoria J / Chamberlain, Alex J / Kelly, John W / Murray, William K / Thompson, John F. ·Victorian Melanoma Service, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC victoria.mar@monash.edu. · Victorian Melanoma Service, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC. · Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC. ·Med J Aust · Pubmed #29020893.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: A Cancer Council Australia multidisciplinary working group is currently revising and updating the 2008 evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma. While there have been many recent improvements in treatment options for metastatic melanoma, early diagnosis remains critical to reducing mortality from the disease. Improved awareness of the atypical presentations of this common malignancy is required to achieve this. A chapter of the new guidelines was therefore developed to aid recognition of atypical melanomas. Main recommendations: Because thick, life-threatening melanomas may lack the more classical ABCD (asymmetry, border irregularity, colour variegation, diameter > 6 mm) features of melanoma, a thorough history of the lesion with regard to change in morphology and growth over time is essential. Any lesion that is changing in morphology or growing over a period of more than one month should be excised or referred for prompt expert opinion. Changes in management as a result of the guidelines: These guidelines provide greater emphasis on improved recognition of the atypical presentations of melanoma, in particular nodular, desmoplastic and acral lentiginous subtypes, with particular awareness of hypomelanotic and amelanotic lesions.

8 Guideline French updated recommendations in Stage I to III melanoma treatment and management. 2017

Guillot, B / Dalac, S / Denis, M G / Dupuy, A / Emile, J F / De La Fouchardiere, A / Hindie, E / Jouary, T / Lassau, N / Mirabel, X / Piperno Neumann, S / De Raucourt, S / Vanwijck, R. ·Dermatology Department, CHU Montpellier. · Dermatology Department, CHU Dijon. · Laboratory of Biochemistry, CHU Nantes. · Dermatology Department, CHU Rennes. · Laboratory of Pathology, AP-HP Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne, France. · Laboratory of Pathology, Centre Léon Bérard Lyon. · Department of Nuclear medicine, CHU Bordeaux. · Dermatology Department, CH Pau. · Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif. · Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Oscar Lambret Lille. · Institut Curie, Paris, France. · 1 Avenue du 6 Juin, 1945, 14000 Caen, France. · Louvain Catholic University, Brussels, Belgium. ·J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol · Pubmed #28120528.

ABSTRACT: As knowledge continues to develop, regular updates are necessary concerning recommendations for practice. The recommendations for the management of melanoma stages I to III were drawn up in 2005. At the request of the Société Française de Dermatologie, they have now been updated using the methodology for recommendations proposed by the Haute Autorité de Santé in France. In practice, the principal recommendations are as follows: for staging, it is recommended that the 7th edition of AJCC be used. The maximum excision margins have been reduced to 2 cm. Regarding adjuvant therapy, the place of interferon has been reduced and no validated emerging medication has yet been identified. Radiotherapy may be considered for patients in Stage III at high risk of relapse. The sentinel lymph node technique remains an option. Initial examination includes routine ultrasound as of Stage II, with other examinations being optional in stages IIC and III. A shorter strict follow-up period (3 years) is recommended for patients, but with greater emphasis on imaging.

9 Guideline ACG Clinical Guideline: Preventive Care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. 2017

Farraye, Francis A / Melmed, Gil Y / Lichtenstein, Gary R / Kane, Sunanda V. ·Section of Gastroenterology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. · Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. · Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. · Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. ·Am J Gastroenterol · Pubmed #28071656.

ABSTRACT: Recent data suggest that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients do not receive preventive services at the same rate as general medical patients. Patients with IBD often consider their gastroenterologist to be the primary provider of care. To improve the care delivered to IBD patients, health maintenance issues need to be co-managed by both the gastroenterologist and primary care team. Gastroenterologists need to explicitly inform the primary care provider of the unique needs of the IBD patient, especially those on immunomodulators and biologics or being considered for such therapy. In particular, documentation of up to date vaccinations are crucial as IBD patients are often treated with long-term immune-suppressive therapies and may be at increased risk for infections, many of which are preventable with vaccinations. Health maintenance issues addressed in this guideline include identification, safety and appropriate timing of vaccinations, screening for osteoporosis, cervical cancer, melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer as well as identification of depression and anxiety and smoking cessation. To accomplish these health maintenance goals, coordination between the primary care provider, gastroenterology team and other specialists is necessary.

10 Guideline [CANCER PATIENTS FOLLOW-UP – CROATIAN SOCIETY FOR MEDICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICAL GUIDELINES Part V: melanoma, sarcomas, central nerve system tumors, lung cancer]. 2016

Herceg, Davorin / Jakopović, Marko / Plavetić, Natalija Dedić / Samaržija, Miroslav / Čučević, Branka / Mijatović, Davor / Nikolić, Igor / Trivanović, Dragan / Šeparović, Robert / Vrbanec, Damir. · ·Lijec Vjesn · Pubmed #30148587.

ABSTRACT: Treatment of oncological patients must be based upon multidisciplinary approach, and takes place in specialized oncological centers. By the end of a specific oncological treatment further follow-up is being managed mostly by the oncologists, but the role of the general practitioners becomes more important every day and therefore should be precisely defined. Nowadays, most of the existing follow-up guidelines are not being based on prospective studies, yet on the expert’s opinion of a precise oncological center or specialists. The aim of the Croatian Society of Medical Oncology (CSMO) with these recommendations is to standardize and rationalize the diagnostic procedures’ algorithm in follow–up of oncological patients after primary treatment, in patients with melanoma, sarcomas, central nerve system tumors and lung cancer.

11 Guideline Head and neck melanoma (excluding ocular melanoma): United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. 2016

Ahmed, O A / Kelly, C. ·Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust,Newcastle upon Tyne,UK. · Northern Centre for Cancer Care and Newcastle University, Freeman Hospital,Newcastle upon Tyne,UK. ·J Laryngol Otol · Pubmed #27841141.

ABSTRACT: This is the official guideline endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the United Kingdom. This paper provides consensus recommendations on the management of melanomas arising in the skin and mucosa of the head and neck region on the basis of current evidence. Recommendations • At-risk individuals should be warned about the correlation between ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure and skin cancer, and should be given advice on UVR protection. (R) • Dermatoscopy can aid in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. (R) • Histological examination after biopsy is essential to confirm the diagnosis and the tumour thickness. (G) • Excisional biopsy is method of choice. (G) • Staging investigations can be performed for both regional and distant disease. (R) • Scanning (computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging) is recommended for patients with high-risk melanoma. (G) • Patients with signs or symptoms of disease relapse should be investigated by imaging. (R) • Imaging of the brain should be performed in patients who have stage IV disease. (G) • Patients with melanoma of unknown primary should be thoroughly examined and investigated for a potential primary source. (R) • Primary cutaneous invasive melanoma should be excised with a surgical margin of at least 1 cm. (G) • The maximum recommended excision margin is 3 cm. (R) • The actual margin of excision depends upon the depth of the melanoma and its anatomical site. (G) • Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core biopsy of suspected lymphadenopathy is more accurate than 'blind' biopsy. (R) • Open biopsy should only be performed if FNA or core biopsy is inadequate or equivocal. (R) • Prior to lymph node dissection, staging by CT scan should be carried out. (R) • If parotid disease is present without neck involvement, both parotidectomy and neck dissection should ideally be performed. (R) • There is no role for elective lymph node dissection. (R) • Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be considered in stage IB and above by specialist skin cancer multidisciplinary teams. (G) • Patients should be made aware that SLNB is a staging procedure, and should understand that it has, as yet, no proven therapeutic value. (R) • All patients with cutaneous melanoma should have their original tumour checked for BRAF gene status, and their subsequent targeted biological therapy based on this. (R) • Patients who develop brain metastases should be considered for stereotactic radio-surgery. (R).

12 Guideline [Update to the recommendations for management of melanoma stages I to III]. 2016

Guillot, B / Dalac, S / Denis, M G / Dupuy, A / Emile, J-F / De La Fouchardière, A / Hindie, E / Jouary, T / Lassau, N / Mirabel, X / Piperno Neumann, S / De Raucourt, S / Vanwijck, R. ·Département de dermatologie, hôpital Saint-Éloi, CHU de Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France. Electronic address: b-guillot@chu-montpellier.fr. · Service de dermatologie, hôpital du Bocage sud, CHU de Dijon, BP 1542, 21079 Dijon cedex, France. · Laboratoire de biochimie, institut de biologie, 9, quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes cedex, France. · Service de dermatologie, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France. · Service d'anatomie pathologique, CHU Ambroise-Paré-Boulogne, 92104 Boulogne cedex, France. · Centre anticancéreux Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France. · Service de médecine nucléire Sud et Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. · Service de médecine, centre hospitalier de Pau, 64000 Pau, France. · Service d'imagerie médicale, institut Gustave-Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France. · Centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Fréderic-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France. · Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. · 1, avenue du 6-Juin, 14000 Caen, France. · Université catholique de Louvain, 10, avenue Hippocrate, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgique. ·Ann Dermatol Venereol · Pubmed #27527567.

ABSTRACT: As knowledge continues to develop, regular updates are necessary concerning recommendations for practice. The recommendations for the management of melanoma stages I to III were drawn up in 2005. At the request of the Société Française de Dermatologie, they have now been updated using the methodology for recommendations proposed by the Haute Autorité de Santé. In practice, the principal recommendations are as follows: for staging, it is recommended that the 7th edition of AJCC be used. The maximum excision margins have been reduced to 2cm. Regarding adjuvant therapy, the place of interferon has been reduced and no validated emerging medication has yet been identified. Radiotherapy may be considered for patients in stage III at high risk of relapse. The sentinel lymph node technique remains an option. Initial examination includes routine ultrasound as of stage II, with other examinations being optional in stages IIC and III. A shorter strict follow-up period (3years) is recommended for patients, but with greater emphasis on imaging.

13 Guideline [Radiotherapy of skin cancers]. 2016

Hennequin, C / Rio, E / Mahé, M-A. ·Service de cancérologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefeaux, 75475 Paris, France. Electronic address: christophe.hennequin2@aphp.fr. · Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest-René-Gauducheau, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France. ·Cancer Radiother · Pubmed #27522189.

ABSTRACT: The indications of radiotherapy for skin cancers are not clearly defined because of the lack of randomised trials or prospective studies. For basal cell carcinomas, radiotherapy frequently offers a good local control, but a randomized trial showed that surgery is more efficient and less toxic. Indications of radiotherapy are contra-indications of surgery for patients older than 60, non-sclerodermiform histology and occurring in non-sensitive areas. Adjuvant radiotherapy could be proposed to squamous cell carcinomas, in case of poor prognostic factors. Dose of 60 to 70Gy are usually required, and must be modulated to the size of the lesions. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems beneficial for desmoplastic melanomas but not for the other histological types. Prophylactic nodal irradiation (45 to 50Gy), for locally advanced tumours (massive nodal involvement), decreases the locoregional failure rate but do not increase survival. Adjuvant radiotherapy (50 to 56Gy) for Merckel cell carcinomas increases also the local control rate, as demonstrated by meta-analysis and a large epidemiological study. Nodal areas must be included, if there is no surgical exploration (sentinel lymph node dissection). Kaposi sarcomas are radiosensitive and could be treated with relatively low doses (24 to 30Gy). Also, cutaneous lymphomas are good indications for radiotherapy: B lymphomas are electively treated with limited fields. The role of total skin electron therapy for T-lymphomas is still discussed; but palliative radiotherapy is very efficient in case of cutaneous nodules.

14 Guideline NCCN Guidelines Insights: Melanoma, Version 3.2016. 2016

Coit, Daniel G / Thompson, John A / Algazi, Alain / Andtbacka, Robert / Bichakjian, Christopher K / Carson, William E / Daniels, Gregory A / DiMaio, Dominick / Fields, Ryan C / Fleming, Martin D / Gastman, Brian / Gonzalez, Rene / Guild, Valerie / Johnson, Douglas / Joseph, Richard W / Lange, Julie R / Martini, Mary C / Materin, Miguel A / Olszanski, Anthony J / Ott, Patrick / Gupta, Aparna Priyanath / Ross, Merrick I / Salama, April K / Skitzki, Joseph / Swetter, Susan M / Tanabe, Kenneth K / Torres-Roca, Javier F / Trisal, Vijay / Urist, Marshall M / McMillian, Nicole / Engh, Anita. ·From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center; Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute; University of Colorado Cancer Center; Aim at Melanoma; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; Yale Cancer Center/Smilow Cancer Hospital; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Duke Cancer Institute; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Stanford Cancer Institute; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network. ·J Natl Compr Canc Netw · Pubmed #27496110.

ABSTRACT: The NCCN Guidelines for Melanoma have been significantly revised over the past few years in response to emerging data on a number of novel agents and treatment regimens. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the data and rationale supporting extensive changes to the recommendations for systemic therapy in patients with metastatic or unresectable melanoma.

15 Guideline Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. 2016

Anonymous2770876 / Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten / Grossman, David C / Curry, Susan J / Davidson, Karina W / Ebell, Mark / Epling, John W / García, Francisco A R / Gillman, Matthew W / Kemper, Alex R / Krist, Alex H / Kurth, Ann E / Landefeld, C Seth / Mangione, Carol M / Phillips, William R / Phipps, Maureen G / Pignone, Michael P / Siu, Albert L. ·University of California, San Francisco. · Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington. · University of Iowa, Iowa City. · Columbia University, New York, New York. · University of Georgia, Athens. · State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse. · Pima County Department of Health, Tucson, Arizona. · Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. · Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. · Fairfax Family Practice Residency, Fairfax, Virginia11Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. · Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. · University of Alabama at Birmingham. · University of California, Los Angeles. · University of Washington, Seattle. · Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. · University of Texas at Austin. · Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York19James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York. ·JAMA · Pubmed #27458948.

ABSTRACT: IMPORTANCE: Basal and squamous cell carcinoma are the most common types of cancer in the United States and represent the vast majority of all cases of skin cancer; however, they rarely result in death or substantial morbidity, whereas melanoma skin cancer has notably higher mortality rates. In 2016, an estimated 76,400 US men and women will develop melanoma and 10,100 will die from the disease. OBJECTIVE: To update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for skin cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the effectiveness of screening for skin cancer with a clinical visual skin examination in reducing skin cancer morbidity and mortality and death from any cause; its potential harms, including any harms resulting from associated diagnostic follow-up; its test characteristics when performed by a primary care clinician vs a dermatologist; and whether its use leads to earlier detection of skin cancer compared with usual care. FINDINGS: Evidence to assess the net benefit of screening for skin cancer with a clinical visual skin examination is limited. Direct evidence on the effectiveness of screening in reducing melanoma morbidity and mortality is limited to a single fair-quality ecologic study with important methodological limitations. Information on harms is similarly sparse. The potential for harm clearly exists, including a high rate of unnecessary biopsies, possibly resulting in cosmetic or, more rarely, functional adverse effects, and the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of visual skin examination by a clinician to screen for skin cancer in adults (I statement).

16 Guideline [Guidelines for stage I to III melanoma]. 2016

Guillot, Bernard / Dalac, Sophie / Denis, Marc / Dupuy, Alain / Emile, Jean François / De La Fouchardiere, Arnaud / Hindie, Elif / Jouary, Thomas / Lassau, Nathalie / Mirabel, Xavier / Piperno Neumann, Sophie / De Raucourt, Sixtine / Vanwijck, Romain. ·Département de dermatologie, hôpital Saint-Eloi, CHU de Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France. Electronic address: b-guillot@chu-montpellier.fr. · Service de dermatologie, hôpital du Bocage sud, CHU de Dijon, BP 1542, 21079 Dijon cedex, France. · Laboratoire de biochimie, institut de biologie, 9, quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes cedex, France. · Service de dermatologie, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France. · Service d'anatomie pathologique, CHU Ambroise-Paré Boulogne, 92104 Boulogne cedex, France. · Centre anticancéreux Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France. · Service de médecine nucléire sud et pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. · Service de médecine, CH de Pau, 64000 Pau, France. · Service d'imagerie médicale, institut Gustave-Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France. · Centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Fréderic-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France. · Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. · Sixtine, 1, avenue du 6 juin, 14000 Caen, France. · Université catholique de Louvain, avenue Hippocrate, 10 B-1200 Bruxelles, Belgique. ·Bull Cancer · Pubmed #27456259.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

17 Guideline [CROATIAN SOCIETY FOR MEDICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICAL GUIDELINES FOR DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH MELANOMA]. 2016

Herceg, Davorin / Buzina, Daska Stulhofer / Ceović, Romana / Dotlić, Snjezana / Ilić, Ivana / Orehovec, Sanda Smuđ / Herceg, Gordana Horvatić / Mijatović, Davor / Separović, Robert / Silovski, Tajana / Vrbanec, Damir. · ·Lijec Vjesn · Pubmed #27290810.

ABSTRACT: Melanoma in the Western world has an increasing incidence. One of the most important factor for the increase in incidence is sporadic, uncontrolled exposure to the sun. The basis for the treatment of primary melanoma is surgical treatment. Treatment of metastatic disease of melanoma in recent years experienced significant changes. BRAF and MEK inhibitors, immunotherapy with programmed cell-death immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1-antibodies) are new options for the treatment of metastatic disease. A mulitidisiplinary team of Croatian Society for Medical Oncology provides recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of melanoma primarily driven to the discovery of new drugs and therapeutic options, that change the prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma.

18 Guideline Melanoma, Version 2.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. 2016

Coit, Daniel G / Thompson, John A / Algazi, Alain / Andtbacka, Robert / Bichakjian, Christopher K / Carson, William E / Daniels, Gregory A / DiMaio, Dominick / Ernstoff, Marc / Fields, Ryan C / Fleming, Martin D / Gonzalez, Rene / Guild, Valerie / Halpern, Allan C / Hodi, F Stephen / Joseph, Richard W / Lange, Julie R / Martini, Mary C / Materin, Miguel A / Olszanski, Anthony J / Ross, Merrick I / Salama, April K / Skitzki, Joseph / Sosman, Jeff / Swetter, Susan M / Tanabe, Kenneth K / Torres-Roca, Javier F / Trisal, Vijay / Urist, Marshall M / McMillian, Nicole / Engh, Anita. · ·J Natl Compr Canc Netw · Pubmed #27059193.

ABSTRACT: This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Melanoma focuses on adjuvant therapy and treatment of in-transit disease, because substantial changes were made to the recommendations for the 2016 update. Depending on the stage of the disease, options for adjuvant therapy now include biochemotherapy and high-dose ipilimumab. Treatment options for in-transit disease now include intralesional injection with talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), a new immunotherapy. These additions prompted re-assessment of the data supporting older recommended treatment options for adjuvant therapy and in-transit disease, resulting in extensive revisions to the supporting discussion sections.

19 Guideline Brazilian guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of primary cutaneous melanoma - Part II. 2016

Castro, Luiz Guilherme Martins / Bakos, Renato Marchiori / Duprat Neto, João Pedreira / Bittencourt, Flávia Vasques / Di Giacomo, Thais Helena Bello / Serpa, Sérgio Schrader / Messina, Maria Cristina de Lorenzo / Loureiro, Walter Refkalefsky / Macarenco, Ricardo Silvestre e Silva / Stolf, Hamilton Ometto / Gontijo, Gabriel. ·Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, SP, Brazil. · Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. · Departamento de Câncer de Pele, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. · Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. · Universidade Estácio de Sá, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. · Universidade Estadual do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil. · Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil. ·An Bras Dermatol · Pubmed #26982779.

ABSTRACT: The last Brazilian guidelines on melanoma were published in 2002. Development in diagnosis and treatment made updating necessary. The coordinators elaborated ten clinical questions, based on PICO system. A Medline search, according to specific MeSH terms for each of the 10 questions was performed and articles selected were classified from A to D according to level of scientific evidence. Based on the results, recommendations were defined and classified according to scientific strength. The present Guidelines were divided in two parts for editorial and publication reasons. In this second part, the following clinical questions were answered: 1) which patients with primary cutaneous melanoma benefit from sentinel lymph node biopsy? 2) Follow-up with body mapping is indicated for which patients? 3) Is preventive excision of acral nevi beneficious to patients? 4) Is preventive excision of giant congenital nevi beneficious to patients? 5) How should stages 0 and I primary cutaneous melanoma patients be followed?

20 Guideline Guidelines of the Brazilian Dermatology Society for diagnosis, treatment and follow up of primary cutaneous melanoma--Part I. 2015

Castro, Luiz Guilherme Martins / Messina, Maria Cristina / Loureiro, Walter / Macarenco, Ricardo Silvestre / Duprat Neto, João Pedreira / Di Giacomo, Thais Helena Bello / Bittencourt, Flávia Vasques / Bakos, Renato Marchiori / Serpa, Sérgio Schrader / Stolf, Hamilton Ometto / Gontijo, Gabriel. ·Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. · Universidade Estadual do Pará, Belém, SP, Brazil. · Departamento de Câncer de Pele, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. · Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. · Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. · Universidade Estácio de Sá, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. · Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil. ·An Bras Dermatol · Pubmed #26734867.

ABSTRACT: The last Brazilian guidelines on melanoma were published in 2002. Development in diagnosis and treatment made updating necessary. The coordinators elaborated ten clinical questions, based on PICO system. A Medline search, according to specific MeSH terms for each of the 10 questions was performed and articles selected were classified from A to D according to level of scientific evidence. Based on the results, recommendations were defined and classified according to scientific strength. The present Guidelines were divided in two parts for editorial and publication reasons. In the first part, the following clinical questions were answered: 1) The use of dermoscopy for diagnosis of primary cutaneous melanoma brings benefits for patients when compared with clinical examination? 2) Does dermoscopy favor diagnosis of nail apparatus melanoma? 3) Is there a prognostic difference when incisional or excisional biopsies are used? 4) Does revision by a pathologist trained in melanoma contribute to diagnosis and treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma? What margins should be used to treat lentigo maligna melanoma and melanoma in situ?

21 Guideline Uveal Melanoma UK National Guidelines. 2015

Nathan, P / Cohen, V / Coupland, S / Curtis, K / Damato, B / Evans, J / Fenwick, S / Kirkpatrick, L / Li, O / Marshall, E / McGuirk, K / Ottensmeier, C / Pearce, N / Salvi, S / Stedman, B / Szlosarek, P / Turnbull, N / Anonymous4090839. ·Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK. Electronic address: nathan.pd@gmail.com. · Ocular Oncology Service, St Bartholomew's and Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK. · Department Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK. · OcuMel UK, UK. · Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK. · University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK. · Patient Representative, UK. · Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK. · The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK. · Southampton University Hospitals and University of Southampton, UK. · University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK. · Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK. · Southampton University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK. · St Bartholomew's Hospital, UK; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. · Project Manager, London, UK. ·Eur J Cancer · Pubmed #26278648.

ABSTRACT: The United Kingdom (UK) uveal melanoma guideline development group used an evidence based systematic approach (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)) to make recommendations in key areas of uncertainty in the field including: the use and effectiveness of new technologies for prognostication, the appropriate pathway for the surveillance of patients following treatment for primary uveal melanoma, the use and effectiveness of new technologies in the treatment of hepatic recurrence and the use of systemic treatments. The guidelines were sent for international peer review and have been accredited by NICE. A summary of key recommendations is presented. The full documents are available on the Melanoma Focus website.

22 Guideline [ANOCEF guidelines for the management of brain metastases]. 2015

Le Rhun, É / Dhermain, F / Noël, G / Reyns, N / Carpentier, A / Mandonnet, E / Taillibert, S / Metellus, P / Anonymous2980820. ·Neuro-oncologie, département de neurochirurgie, hôpital Roger-Salengro, CHRU de Lille, rue Émile-Laine, 59037 Lille cedex, France; Oncologie médicale, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, BP 307, 59020 Lille cedex, France; Laboratoire Prism, université Lille 1, Inserm U1192, bâtiment SN3 1(er) étage, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq cedex, France; Groupe de réflexion sur la prise en charge des métastases cérébrales (GRPCMaC) , 13273 Marseille cedex 09, France. Electronic address: emilie.lerhun@chru-lille.fr. · Groupe de réflexion sur la prise en charge des métastases cérébrales (GRPCMaC) , 13273 Marseille cedex 09, France; Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France; Réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire de neuro-oncologie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France. · Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre de lutte contre le cancer Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, BP 42, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire EA 3430, fédération de médecine translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), université de Strasbourg, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67085 Strasbourg cedex, France. · Département de neurochirurgie, hôpital Roger-Salengro, CHRU de Lille, rue Émile-Laine, 59037 Lille cedex, France. · Service de neurologie, hôpital Avicenne, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 125, rue de Stalingrad, 93009 Bobigny cedex, France. · Département de neurochirurgie, hôpital Lariboisière, 2, rue Ambroise-Paré, 75010 Paris, France. · Département de neurologie 2, groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; Département de radiothérapie, groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie Paris VI, 4, place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France. · Groupe de réflexion sur la prise en charge des métastases cérébrales (GRPCMaC) , 13273 Marseille cedex 09, France; Département de neurochirurgie, centre hospitalo-universitaire La Timone, AP-HM, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France; Centre de recherche en oncologie et oncopharmacologie (CRO2), faculté de médecine Timone, université Aix-Marseille, 27, boulevard Jean-Moulin, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France; Inserm U911, faculté de médecine Timone, 27, boulevard Jean-Moulin, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France. ·Cancer Radiother · Pubmed #25666314.

ABSTRACT: The incidence of brain metastases is increasing because of the use of new therapeutic agents, which allow an improvement of overall survival, but with only a poor penetration into the central nervous system brain barriers. The management of brain metastases has changed due to a better knowledge of immunohistochemical data and molecular biological data, the development of new surgical, radiotherapeutic approaches and improvement of systemic treatments. Most of the time, the prognosis is still limited to several months, nevertheless, prolonged survival may be now observed in some sub-groups of patients. The main prognostic factors include the type and subtype of the primitive, age, general status of the patient, number and location of brain metastases, extracerebral disease. The multidisciplinary discussion should take into account all of these parameters. We should notice also that treatments including surgery or radiotherapy may be proposed in a symptomatic goal in advanced phases of the disease underlying the multidisciplinary approach until late in the evolution of the disease. This article reports on the ANOCEF (French neuro-oncology association) guidelines. The management of brain metastases of breast cancers and lung cancers are discussed in the same chapter, while the management of melanoma brain metastases is reported in a separate chapter due to different responses to the brain radiotherapy.

23 Guideline Guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL), short version. Extension assessment and principles of resection in cutaneous head and neck tumors. 2014

Anonymous4420813 / Durbec, M / Couloigner, V / Tronche, S / Albert, S / Kanitakis, J / Ltaief Boudrigua, A / Malard, O / Maubec, E / Mourrain Langlois, E / Navailles, B / Peuvrel, L / Phulpin, B / Thimonier, J-C / Disant, F / Dolivet, G. ·Service d'ORL, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France. Electronic address: mickael.durbec@chu-lyon.fr. · Société française d'ORL & CCF, 26, rue Lalo, 75116 Paris, France. · Service d'ORL, hôpital Bichat, AP-HP, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. · Service de dermatologie, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France. · Service de radiologie, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France. · Service d'ORL, Hôtel-Dieu, 1, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France. · Service de dermatologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France. · Service de radiologie, Hôtel-Dieu, 1, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France. · Service d'ORL, centre hospitalier de Valence, 179, avenue du Maréchal-Juin, 26000 Valence, France. · Service d'onco-dermatologie, Hôtel-Dieu, 1, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France. · Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. · Service d'ORL, hôpital Édouard-Herriot, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France. · Service d'ORL, département de chirurgie oncologique, institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. ·Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis · Pubmed #25456243.

ABSTRACT: Cutaneous head and neck tumors mainly comprise malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, trichoblastic carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, adnexal carcinoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, sclerodermiform basalioma and angiosarcoma. Adapted management requires an experienced team with good knowledge of the various parameters relating to health status, histology, location and extension: risk factors for aggression, extension assessment, resection margin requirements, indications for specific procedures, such as lateral temporal bone resection, orbital exenteration, resection of the calvarium and meningeal envelopes, neck dissection and muscle resection.

24 Guideline [Locoregional treatments of brain metastases for patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma: French national guidelines]. 2014

Lubrano, V / Derrey, S / Truc, G / Mirabel, X / Thariat, J / Cupissol, D / Sassolas, B / Combemale, P / Modiano, P / Bedane, C / Dygai-Cochet, I / Lamant, L / Mourrégot, A / Rougé Bugat, M-È / Siegrist, S / Tiffet, O / Mazeau-Woynar, V / Verdoni, L / Planchamp, F / Leccia, M-T / Anonymous610807. ·Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital de Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse, 1, avenue du Professeur-Jean-Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse, France. · Département de neurochirurgie, hôpital Charles-Nicolle, 1, rue de Germont, 76000 Rouen, France. · Département de radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Professeur-Marion, BP 77980, 21079 Dijon, France. · Département de radiothérapie-curiethérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, BP 307, 59020 Lille, France. · Pôle de radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France. · Service d'oncologie médicale, ICM, institut du cancer de Montpellier Val-d'Aurelle, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier, France. · Service de dermatologie, hôpital Cavale-Blanche, boulevard Tanguy-Prigent, 29609 Brest, France. · Unité onco-dermatologie, centre Léon Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France. · Service de dermatologie, hôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul, boulevard de Belfort, BP 387, 59020 Lille, France. · Service de dermatologie, hôpital Dupuytren, 2, avenue Martin-Luther-King, 87042 Limoges, France. · Service de médecine nucléaire, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Professeur-Marion, BP 77980, 21079 Dijon, France. · Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital Purpan, place Baylac, 31059 Toulouse, France. · Service de chirurgie oncologique, ICM, institut du cancer de Montpellier Val-d'Aurelle, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier, France. · Cabinet médical, 59, rue de la Providence, 31500 Toulouse, France. · Cabinet médical, 3, rue Saint-Sigisbert, 57050 le Ban-Saint-Martin, France. · Service de chirurgie générale et thoracique, centre hospitalier universitaire, 42055 Saint-Étienne, France. · Direction des recommandations et de la qualité de l'expertise, Institut national du cancer, 52, avenue André-Morizet, 92513 Boulogne-Billancourt, France. · Direction des recommandations et de la qualité de l'expertise, Institut national du cancer, 52, avenue André-Morizet, 92513 Boulogne-Billancourt, France. Electronic address: recommandations@institutcancer.fr. · Clinique de dermatolo-vénéréologie, photobiologie et allergologie, pôle pluridisciplinaire de médecine, hôpital Michallon, 38043 Grenoble, France. ·Neurochirurgie · Pubmed #25241016.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: The management of metastatic cutaneous melanoma is changing, marked by innovative therapies. However, their respective use and place in the therapeutic strategy continue to be debated by healthcare professionals. OBJECTIVE: The French national cancer institute has led a national clinical practice guideline project since 2008. It has carried out a review of these modalities of treatment and established recommendations. METHODS: The clinical practice guidelines development process is based on systematic literature review and critical appraisal by experts. The recommendations are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines are reviewed by independent practitioners in cancer care delivery. RESULTS: This article presents the results of bibliographic search, the conclusions of the literature and the recommendations concerning locoregional treatments of brain metastases for patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

25 Guideline Spitz/Reed nevi: proposal of management recommendations by the Dermoscopy Study Group of the Italian Society of Dermatology (SIDeMaST). 2014

Broganelli, P / Titli, S / Lallas, A / Alaibac M Annetta, A / Battarra, V / Brunetti, B / Castagno, I / Cavicchini, S / Ferrari, A / Ghigliotti, G / Landi, C / Manganoni, A / Moscarella, E / Pellacani, G / Pizzichetta, M A / Rosina, P / Rubegni, P / Satta, R / Scalvenzi, M / Stanganelli, I / Stinco, G / Zalaudek, I / Zampieri, P / Argenziano, G / Anonymous1410806. ·Department of Oncology and Hematology, Section of Dermatology, City of Health and Science Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy - paolobroganelli@inwind.it. ·G Ital Dermatol Venereol · Pubmed #25213387.

ABSTRACT: -- No abstract --

Next