Pick Topic
Review Topic
List Experts
Examine Expert
Save Expert
  Site Guide ··   
Melanoma: HELP
Articles by Neil Pearce
Based on 2 articles published since 2008
||||

Between 2008 and 2019, N. Pearce wrote the following 2 articles about Melanoma.
 
+ Citations + Abstracts
1 Guideline Uveal Melanoma UK National Guidelines. 2015

Nathan, P / Cohen, V / Coupland, S / Curtis, K / Damato, B / Evans, J / Fenwick, S / Kirkpatrick, L / Li, O / Marshall, E / McGuirk, K / Ottensmeier, C / Pearce, N / Salvi, S / Stedman, B / Szlosarek, P / Turnbull, N / Anonymous4090839. ·Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK. Electronic address: nathan.pd@gmail.com. · Ocular Oncology Service, St Bartholomew's and Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK. · Department Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK. · OcuMel UK, UK. · Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK. · University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK. · Patient Representative, UK. · Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK. · The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK. · Southampton University Hospitals and University of Southampton, UK. · University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK. · Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK. · Southampton University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK. · St Bartholomew's Hospital, UK; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. · Project Manager, London, UK. ·Eur J Cancer · Pubmed #26278648.

ABSTRACT: The United Kingdom (UK) uveal melanoma guideline development group used an evidence based systematic approach (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)) to make recommendations in key areas of uncertainty in the field including: the use and effectiveness of new technologies for prognostication, the appropriate pathway for the surveillance of patients following treatment for primary uveal melanoma, the use and effectiveness of new technologies in the treatment of hepatic recurrence and the use of systemic treatments. The guidelines were sent for international peer review and have been accredited by NICE. A summary of key recommendations is presented. The full documents are available on the Melanoma Focus website.

2 Article Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan in uveal melanoma: A safe and effective treatment modality in an orphan disease. 2018

Karydis, Ioannis / Gangi, Alexandra / Wheater, Matthew J / Choi, Junsung / Wilson, Iain / Thomas, Kerry / Pearce, Neil / Takhar, Arjun / Gupta, Sanjay / Hardman, Danielle / Sileno, Sean / Stedman, Brian / Zager, Jonathan S / Ottensmeier, Christian. ·Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. · University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. · Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. · Department of Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. · Morsani School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. ·J Surg Oncol · Pubmed #29284076.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) carries a poor prognosis; liver is the most frequent and often solitary site of recurrence. Available systemic treatments have not improved outcomes. Melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion (M-PHP) allows selective intrahepatic delivery of high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of outcomes data of UM patients receiving M-PHP at two institutions was performed. Tumor response and toxicity were evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients received 134 M-PHP procedures (median of 2 M-PHPs). 25 (49%) achieved a partial (N = 22, 43.1%) or complete hepatic response (N = 3, 5.9%). In 17 (33.3%) additional patients, the disease stabilized for at least 3 months, for a hepatic disease control rate of 82.4%. After median follow-up of 367 days, median overall progression free (PFS) and hepatic progression free survival (hPFS) was 8.1 and 9.1 months, respectively and median overall survival was 15.3 months. There were no treatment related fatalities. Non-hematologic grade 3-4 events were seen in 19 (37.5%) patients and were mainly coagulopathic (N = 8) and cardiovascular (N = 9). CONCLUSIONS: M-PHP results in durable intrahepatic disease control and can form the basis for an integrated multimodality treatment approach in appropriately selected UM patients.